The Newmarket Record

Committee of Adjustment

November 18, 2015

What was decided (7 motions)

7 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

THAT Minor Variance Application D13-A20-15 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. that the variances pertain only to the construction of a 2 storey dwelling ; 2. that development be substantially in accordance with the Site Plan submitted with the application; 3. that the applicants be advised that prior to the issuance of any building permit compliance will be required with the provisions of the Town’s Tree Preservation, Protection, Replacement and Enhancement Policy and the items identified by the Town’s Consulting Arborist in a report dated October 3, 2015; and 4. that the applicants be advised that prior to the issuance of any building permit, the owners will be required to enter into a site plan agreement with the Town for the development of the subject lands. as the Minor Variance Application: (1) as submitted is not minor in nature, however, a 2 storey dwelling appears to be minor in nature as the impact on adjacent properties will be negligible; (2) conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw as both documents permit detached dwellings; and (3) does not adversely affect the character of the neighbourhood as the use is permitted and is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, buildings or structures.
Moved by Gino Vescio, seconded by Peter Mertens
Carried
THAT Minor Variance Application D13-A22-15 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the variance pertains only to the requests as submitted with the application; 2. That the applicant be advised that prior to the issuance of any building permit compliance will be required with the provisions of the Town’s Tree Preservation, Protection, Replacement and Enhancement Policy and with the items identified by the Town’s Consulting Arborist in a report dated November 10, 2015; and 3. That the development be substantially in accordance with the sketch submitted with the application. as the Minor Variance Application: (1) is minor in nature as the impact on adjacent properties appears to be minimal ; (2) conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law as both documents permit residential uses on the property; and (3) does not adversely affect the character of the neighbourhood and is considered a desirable development of the lot.
Moved by Peter Mertens, seconded by Elizabeth Lew
Carried
THAT Minor Variance Application D13-A23-15 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. that the variances pertain only to the request as submitted with the application; and 2. that development be substantially in accordance with the sketch submitted with the application. as the Minor Variance Application: (1) appears to be minor in nature as the impact on adjacent properties will be negligible; (2) conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw as both documents permit accessory structures; and (3) does not adversely affect the character of the neighbourhood as the use is permitted and normally contemplated as an accessory use to a detached dwelling and is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, buildings or structures.
Moved by Fred Stoneman, seconded by Ken Smith
Carried
THAT the Minutes of the Wednesday, October 21 st , 2015 meeting be approved as circulated.
Moved by Peter Mertens, seconded by Ken Smith
Carried
THAT the meeting dates for hearings for the year 201 6 be scheduled as follows: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Wednesday, February 17, 2016 Wednesday, March 16, 2016 Wednesday, April 20, 2016 Wednesday, May 18, 2016 Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Wednesday, August 17, 2016 Wednesday, September 21, 2016 Wednesday, October 19, 2016 Wednesday, November 16, 2016 Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Moved by Fred Stoneman, seconded by Elizabeth Lew
Carried
THAT the Meeting adjourn.
Moved by Fred Stoneman, seconded by Ken Smith
Carried
2 of 2 Town of Newmarket I Committee of Adjustment I Minutes – November 18, 2015 6 THAT Minor Variance Application D13-A20-15 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. that the variances pertain only to the construction of a 2 storey dwelling; 2. that development be substantially in accordance with the Site Plan submitted with the application; 3. that the applicants be advised that prior to the issuance of any building permit compliance will be required with the provisions of the Town’s Tree Preservation, Protection, Replacement and Enhancement Policy and the items identified by the Town’s Consulting Arborist in a report dated October 3, 2015; and 4. that the applicants be advised that prior to the issuance of any building permit, the owners will be required to enter into a site plan agreement with the Town for the development of the subject lands. as the Minor Variance Application: (1) as submitted is not minor in nature, however, a 2 storey dwelling appears to be minor in nature as the impact on adjacent properties will be negligible; (2) conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw as both documents permit detached dwellings; and (3) does not adversely affect the character of the neighbourhood as the use is permitted and is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, buildings or structures.
Moved by Gino Vescio, seconded by Peter Mertens
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.